What the ‘Clean Slate’ needs to keep in mind
New board majority need to prove they care about other issues
The Board of Trustees elections have come to a close and a new era, with new controversies, is soon to begin at College of DuPage. Notoriously outspoken and President Robert Breuder-intolerant Trustee Kathy Hamilton has gotten her wish: candidates Deanne Mazzochi, Frank Napolitano, and Charles Bernstein were elected as our three new trustees. Hamilton actively endorsed the candidates, who called themselves the “Clean Slate.” The question remains: will they really fit that bill?
We think they could. Though we did not endorse Napolitano and Bernstein, they earned the support of the community and hold a firm stance on issues involving Breuder. In many ways, they are carbon copies of Hamilton’s ideals and this will certainly play into future board rulings. With Hamilton and the Clean Slate on the board, many decisions could end up 4-3. By collaborating together, these candidates will have the power to dominate our board, hopefully with the best interest of students, faculty, and the community in mind.
While we aren’t fighting the Clean Slate on their stance against Breuder, we do hope they put some effort into other issues at the college as well. These trustees will be around until 2021. They’ll need to do a lot more than passive-aggressively tweet about Breuder to gain our approval in the long run. They’ve already convinced the community that they have the potential to turn the school around for the better. Now they have to prove it with their actions.
For us, the main concern is gaining back trust between the faculty and the administration. It’s no secret the two sides have been battling it out for some time now. Even though full-time faculty did not endorse these two particular candidates, we hope that both they and the new board can look past their differences and reach a common ground. This restoration is crucial to keeping the peace and saving COD’s renowned reputation. If we can’t work together, we won’t work at all.
Of course there’s also the concern of what the Clean Slate will do for students. As the sole reason the school exists in the first place, it’s unquestionably essential to keep education not only accessible for them, but also at the best quality available. Amid the mess of administrative scandals, it’s easy to forget about the one thing at school that won’t change: students. They will always need a way to afford education and they will always deserve the highest quality possible. The board must remember that there’s more to COD than its finances.
Although there is hope for this new era, there’s also fear. A 4-3 vote on any decision can be dangerous, but this new administration will soon be picking our new college president to replace Breuder. The Clean Slate members, titling themselves like a middle-school clique, have already made a point to set themselves apart from the rest of the board and band together. And though they have shown promise for change, excluding or working against other members is certainly not ideal and could lead us down the same road as before. The Clean Slate needs to consider the other board members and not work on their own separate agenda. This isn’t “House of Cards,” it’s College of DuPage. Unity should be the end goal, not supremacy. Hamilton, Mazzochi, Napolitano, and Bernstein have come this far, but they have even farther to go before we can assess their abilities and gauge just how well this election turned out.
I.M. Annonymous • Apr 27, 2015 at 9:21 pm
journalists? no.
cowards! yes.
I’m sure you’ll find a rewarding job as a PR hack
I remember when the Courier was a real newspaper.
I. M. Anonymous • Apr 25, 2015 at 5:23 pm
I hope the new board majority sticks together and ignores the “other members” who rubber stamped
Breuder’s vanity projects at the expense of COD’s mission and student needs.
Your assertion that :
“The Clean Slate needs to consider the other board members and not work on their own separate agenda.”
Ignores that the “other board members” agenda seems to have been to give no bid contracts to FOB (Friends of Breuder).
Hamilton has been the only board member to try to stop what has plainly been official misconduct and corruption.
For her trouble the “other board members” who you seem worried about voted a resolution censure against her!
This college has been run by Breuder as his own personal kingdom and the previous board was complicit.
The Restaurant that students don’t get trained at loses $500,000/yr.
but COD buys Breuder and FOB (usually trustees and administrators) lavish meals and pricy wines and liquor.
Nothing is too good for Breuder and COD pays.
The vanity boutique hotel that no one stays at but Breuder.
Nothing is too good for Breuder and COD pays.
The vanity homeland security institute with a mock downtown that again doesn’t seem to serve students
but does curry favor with local law enforcement.
This white elephant (not the ones Breuder shoots on safari) will be renamed in his honor
by a vote of those “other board members” you seem worried about.
Nothing is too good for Breuder and COD pays.
Breuder embarrassed the college when his scheme to publicly trap the Illinois governor blew up and COD lost $20 million.
Lying about enrollment. Raising tuition. Raising taxes.
For this and all the other probably criminal actions approved of by those “other board members”
voted Breuder a golden parachute of $762,000 when he should be getting jail time.
Now state law makers are review the college’s funding and passing laws against the pattern of corruption seen at COD.
What has gone on at this school with President Breuder has made the College of DuPage a national laughing stock,
and those “other board member” had the power to stop all the questionable practices by doing their job.
These “other member ” failed to do the honorable, honest, and required duties.
They deserve no consideration by the new board majority, none.
If these “other members” had any sense of shame they would resign.
We are at a very dark time at COD and it’s the old board members that let this happen.
Very sincerely,
I. M. Anonymous